John Richardson Computers Ltd v Flanders, 1993, FSR 497
Citation: John Richardson Computers Ltd v Flanders, 1993, FSR 497
Link to case on WorldLII (reference).
Rule of thumb:Does stock alter software get copyright protection, even if another person adapts it? Yes, where the underlying structure of copyright is the same, the original drafter of that software holds the copyright to it.
Judgment:
Even where 2 programmes look totally different, where the underlying structure is very similar, this is sufficient to establish copyright infringement. The basic facts of this case were that Flanders had worked for John Richardson Computers and helped to develop a computer programme whereby pharmacists were given alerts on when they needed more stock, and related to their computer which they printed out the prescription on. The Computer company had only done this for certain computers, and Flanders wrote this so that it was compatible for a different computer system – this meant that when the 2 codes were side by side they looked nothing alike, even although they both produced extremely similar effects. The Court held that this was an infringement of copyright, ‘... this means that consideration is not restricted to the text of the code...’ Ferris J
Warning: This is not professional legal advice. This is not professional legal education advice. Please obtain professional guidance before embarking on any legal course of action. This is just an interpretation of a Judgment by persons of legal insight & varying levels of legal specialism, experience & expertise. Please read the Judgment yourself and form your own interpretation of it with professional assistance.