placeholder-image coin

Yule’s Trs v Deans, 1919 SC 570

Yule’s Trs v Deans, 1919 SC 570


Citation:Yule’s Trs v Deans, 1919 SC 570

Link to case on WorldLII.

Rule of thumb: If there is a condition set to obtain property from a will, is it automatically invalid? No, provided it is a reasonable & productive condition then it may be enforceable.

Judgment:

This case affirmed the principle of ‘spontaneous contingency conditions’ – people under wills are free to think up new conditions to be met before their legatees in their will may be entitled to property. The Court held that this is subject of course to the usual rules like repugnancy, overly onerous, public policy (statutes and common law breaches) etc, ‘I reject the notion that conditional vesting must not be applied to any case merely because there is no precedent for it. It must not, however, be invoked, however great may be the temptation, in any case where by so doing we should subvert some firmly established rule of construction’, Lord Shand at 57

centered image

Warning: This is not professional legal advice. This is not professional legal education advice. Please obtain professional guidance before embarking on any legal course of action. This is just an interpretation of a Judgment by persons of legal insight & varying levels of legal specialism, experience & expertise. Please read the Judgment yourself and form your own interpretation of it with professional assistance.