placeholder-image coin

Technograph v Mills and Rockley, 1972 RPC 346

Technograph v Mills and Rockley, 1972 RPC 346


Citation:Technograph v Mills and Rockley, 1972 RPC 346

None. Library research required

Rule of thumb:What is the fundamental test for obtaining a patent? Where a new product is too obvious then it does not pass the test of being novel – there actually has to be an inventive step – it cannot be a mosaic put together by a clever but unimaginative man.

centered image

Ratio-decidendi:

‘In dealing with obviousness, unlike novelty, it is permissible to make a mosaic out of the relevant documents, but it must be a mosaic which can be put together by an unimaginative man with no inventive capacity’, Lord Reid

Warning: This is not professional legal advice. This is not professional legal education advice. Please obtain professional guidance before embarking on any legal course of action. This is just an interpretation of a Judgment by persons of legal insight & varying levels of legal specialism, experience & expertise. Please read the Judgment yourself and form your own interpretation of it with professional assistance.